Subscriber Account active since. The company posted an ad that says "I flash in mycalvins," with an upskirt shot to its Instagram page. An edited photo is pictured right. We've chosen not to post the whole image, but if you want to view it, you can click here. The ad is drawing a fierce reaction online from critics who see it as pervy and sexist. Seriously not a good look CK. If no one sees a problem with this then I suggest you get a reality check with a psychologist. As if women don't get enough uncalled for sexual attention, now this marketing image comes out.
More Like This
Related Articles
Owasso police have released additional information about a teacher charged with taking "upskirt" photos of a year-old girl in his classroom. The Tulsa County District Attorney says Adam Hunt is charged with peeping Tom by using photographic equipment, which is a felony count. Court documents say between August of and June of , Hunt took images of a girl at the Owasso Seventh Grade Center without her knowledge. Deputy Chief of Police Jason Woodruff said they learned of the photos during a domestic incident at a home in the block of East 95th Street North in November of
Top Headlines
Texas' highest criminal court struck down part of a law banning "upskirt" photos on Wednesday, arguing that photos taken without permission in public are entitled to First Amendment protections. Outlawing "improper photography or visual recording," the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals panel ruled, would be a violation of federal free-speech rights and a "paternalistic" effort to regulate the photographers' thoughts. According to the Houston Chronicle , the case involved Ronald Thompson, who was charged with 26 counts of improper photography in after taking underwater pictures of swimsuit-clad children at a San Antonio water park. Thompson challenged the constitutionality of the improper photography ban before his case even went to trial, claiming that "a plain reading of the law would place street photographers, entertainment journalists, arts patrons, pep rally attendees and 'even the harmless eccentric' at risk of incarceration.
A three-month public consultation was launched yesterday on newly proposed offenses, including voyeurism, intimate prying and non-consensual photography of intimate parts, such as upskirt photos. The security bureau had earlier suggested criminalizing acts of observing or recording intimate acts for sexual purposes without authorization. It also proposed to outlaw taking intimate photos or videos, such as upskirt photos, without the consent of those who were filmed and the distribution of such images. However, the proposed offense did not cover "down-blousing" - taking pictures of collars - as it believed the definition of the act was not clear and it may cover a wide range of scenarios, including taking a selfie. According to its consultation paper to the public, offenders who commit acts of voyeurism or non-consensual photography of intimate parts for sexual purposes could be jailed for up to five years. It said the police had received complaints that nude photos were distributed by former partners from time to time. Therefore, the proposal has also included non-consensual distribution of intimate images which the victim had agreed to take to further protect them.
